
How to turn a disqualification into community service.
Section 94 of the Land Transport Act
Section 94 of the Land Transport Act 1998 (NZ) allows a court, in very specific circumstances, to substitute a mandatory driving disqualification with a community-based sentence—typically community work or supervision.
When does Section 94 apply?
According to current legislation:
-
The driver must have been previously disqualified (even just once
-
The court finds that a further disqualification would be inappropriate, considering:
-
The nature of the offence and the offender
-
How effective previous disqualifications have been
-
The personal impact of renewed disqualification (e.g., job loss)
-
The public interest
-
-
The court determines that a community-based sentence is more suitable.
-
This includes community work, or supervision or intensive supervision where available However, Section 94 does not apply if:
-
-
Section 63 or 65 (mandatory indefinite disqualification for certain repeat alcohol/drug offences) applies, or
-
An alcohol interlock sentence has been ordered under Section 65AC, or
-
The offender is barred from a limited licence under Section 103
-
🧩 Why was this introduced?
Courts use Section 94 to avoid “extremely long or successive disqualifications” that disproportionately harm individuals—especially where losing a licence would impact their employment or family life .
A judge in Timbrell v NZ Police [2018] confirmed that Section 94 is not limited to offenders caught in an endless cycle of disqualifications; it can be applied more broadly where just and appropriate
🛠️ How does an application work?
Typically:
-
The offender pleads guilty or is convicted.
-
A Section 94 application is made at sentencing.
-
Evidence (like affidavits) may be submitted to the court—e.g., to support hardship or employment loss arguments
-
If successful, instead of extending the ban, the court orders community work or supervision, along with any other fitting penalties (fines, costs)
⚖️ Who is it for?
-
Typically used by those who would suffer disproportionate hardship if disqualified again, especially for work or caregiving reasons .
-
It can be used for offenders on their second offence—not just those in a cycle of reoffending—if it's a fair response
-
Not available for first-time disqualification cases or where other stricter sections (63, 65) apply.
📋 Summary Table
Criteria
Requirement
Previous disqualification
Yes (any prior court order)
Inappropriateness of new ban
Court must find it inappropriate
Public interest & personal impact
Must justify substitution
Community sentence suitability
Required
Exclusions
Sections 63, 65, alcohol interlock, licence bans
📝 Bottom line
Section 94 offers a flexible alternative to rigid disqualification by enabling courts to impose community-based sentences instead. Its primary goal is to balance road safety with fairness—especially for people whose livelihoods or family responsibilities hinge on having a driver's licence.
If you're facing traffic charges and think Section 94 might apply, consulting a lawyer early is wise—affidavits and legal submissions often make a strong case
