​

Restorative justice (RJ) in New Zealand is an alternative approach to dealing with crime that focuses on repairing harm rather than just punishing the offender. It is widely used in both adult and youth justice systems, particularly for cases where victims and offenders are willing to participate in a facilitated conference. From a lawyer’s perspective, RJ presents both opportunities and challenges in the legal system.

1. Legal Framework

Restorative justice in New Zealand operates under the Sentencing Act 2002, the Victims’ Rights Act 2002, and the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989 (now known as the Oranga Tamariki Act). These laws provide the foundation for RJ processes, including court-referred conferences and the consideration of restorative outcomes in sentencing.

• Sentencing Act 2002 (Sections 7–10): Courts must take into account whether an RJ process has occurred and its outcomes when sentencing an offender.

• Victims’ Rights Act 2002: Victims must be informed of their right to participate in RJ and be consulted throughout the process.

• Oranga Tamariki Act 1989: Youth justice prioritizes family group conferences (FGCs), a form of RJ, as a key decision-making tool before charges are laid.

2. The Role of Lawyers in RJ

Lawyers play an essential role in ensuring their clients—both victims and offenders—understand their rights and obligations in RJ processes. Their involvement typically includes:

For Defense Lawyers:

• Advising the client on whether RJ is appropriate and in their best interests.

• Ensuring that participation is voluntary and that the offender takes genuine responsibility for their actions.

• Presenting RJ outcomes in court to seek a more favorable sentence (e.g., reduced penalties or alternative sentencing).

• Advocating for the offender’s legal rights during the process, especially if they feel pressured into admitting guilt.

For Prosecutors:

• Ensuring that RJ does not undermine public interest in accountability.

• Supporting victim participation while ensuring their safety and emotional well-being.

• Assessing whether an RJ agreement aligns with justice system principles.

For Victims' Lawyers:

• Advising victims on their rights and how RJ might affect their case.

• Ensuring victims are not re-traumatized or coerced into participation.

• Helping negotiate fair restitution or agreements.

3. Benefits of RJ for Legal Practitioners

From a legal perspective, RJ offers several advantages:
✅ Better outcomes for clients: Offenders who show remorse and engage in RJ may receive more lenient sentences.
✅ Victim empowerment: Victims have a voice in the justice process, which can lead to closure and healing.
✅ Efficiency: RJ can reduce court backlog by resolving some cases outside of formal hearings.
✅ Lower recidivism rates: Offenders who go through RJ are less likely to reoffend compared to those processed through the traditional system.

4. Challenges and Limitations for Lawyers

Despite its benefits, RJ also presents challenges:
❌ Not suitable for all cases: Serious crimes (e.g., sexual violence, murder) may not be appropriate for RJ.
❌ Potential for coercion: Offenders may feel pressured to participate for a reduced sentence, rather than genuine remorse.
❌ Lack of legal representation in conferences: Lawyers typically do not attend RJ meetings, which may disadvantage their clients.
❌ Inconsistent outcomes: The informality of RJ can lead to variability in agreements, making it harder to predict sentencing outcomes.

5. Conclusion

For lawyers in New Zealand, restorative justice is a powerful tool that can provide alternative resolutions to criminal cases. While it offers significant benefits in terms of rehabilitation and victim participation, legal professionals must navigate ethical considerations and procedural safeguards to ensure justice is served fairly. Understanding the legal framework and the role of RJ in sentencing is essential for any lawyer involved in criminal law practice.

 

​